Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has sued the above-named defendants for reinstatement to his job and various forms of damages. He contends his discharge by defendant TWA, purportedly based upon a valid union-shop agreement with defendant IAM, was in violation of the Railway Labor Act. 1 Plaintiff and the IAM have filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
After considering the oral argument and various parts of the record, it appears this case may not be disposed of under Rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A., as construed by our Court of Appeals. In this Circuit, a District Court, in disposing of a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Nedd v. United Mine Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Fred Thompson v. Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, an Unincorporated Railroad Labor Organization, National in ScopeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Freiburger v. Emery Air Charter, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Nedd v. United Mine WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.