INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 857 v. Seem
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying appellants’ blended motion for amended findings or a new trial after the district court, upon appellants’ challenge, had affirmed an order of the county superintendent of schools of Fillmore County in a school district consolidation proceeding.
Respondents made a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that it was taken more than 6 months after the entry of judgment and that proper notice of appeal was not served on the adverse parties. Initially, during summer adjournment, we denied that motion pending the filing of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Tombs v. AshworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Harcum v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Peterson v. Joint Independent Consolidated School District No. 116Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- The Jesmer Co. v. Wurdemann-Hjelm Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kearns v. Julette Originals Dress Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Arndt v. Minnesota Education AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Independent School District No. 194 Lakeville v. Tollefson Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965