United States v. Gino Gonzaga Rodriquez, United States of America v. Gino Gonzaga Rodriquez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted Gino Rodriquez of being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the firearm because consent to search was not voluntary. He also contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. On cross-appeal, the government maintains that the district court erroneously concluded that Rodriquez’s prior drug convictions do not qualify as predicate offenses under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). We conclude that the search was conducted…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. RodriquezSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. ClantonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Victor Saravia-Paguada v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- CARACHURI-ROSENDOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.