Legal Opinion
CARACHURI-ROSENDO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2007No. ID 3592PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
24 I&N Dec. 382
(BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3592 In re Jose Angel CARACHURI-ROSENDO, Respondent File A44 075 911 - Houston Decided December 13, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Decisional authority from the Supreme Court and the controlling Federal circuit court of appeals is determinative of whether a State drug offense constitutes an “aggravated felony” under section 101(a)(43)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B) (2000), by virtue of its correspondence to the Federal felony…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Carachuri-Rosendo v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Luis Juarez Alvarado v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Enriquez-Gutierrez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Alsol v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Carachuri-Rosendo v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.