Legal Opinion
Barocas v. Gorenstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 25, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), entered December 3, 1990, which denied their motion to dismiss the action on the ground of forum non conveniens.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss the action on the ground of forum non conveniens. In this case the plaintiff’s decedent was injured, and subsequently died from the injuries, while he was sitting atop…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. PahlaviNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Banco Ambrosiano v. Artoc Bank & Trust Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Broida v. BancroftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bader & Bader v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Corines v. DobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Xiu Zhang Yin v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kirkaldy v. Hertz CorporationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Hunt v. Mirage Casino-HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999