Kirkaldy v. Hertz Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In two related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) the defendant Hertz Corpora*600tion appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), entered May 24, 1994, as (a) denied the branches of its motion which were to dismiss the respective complaints insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action or to dismiss the complaints on the ground that New York is an inconvenient forum, and (b) granted the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaints to add a cause of action against Hertz Corporation for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. PahlaviNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fogel v. Hertz International, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Milliken v. HolstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Sarfaty v. Rainbow Helicopters, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Success Marketing Electronics, Inc. v. Titan Security, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Friedler v. PalyompisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Schulman v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999