Legal Opinion

Consumers' Roofing Co. v. Littlejohn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 7, 1933No. 5 Div. 164PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Section 7249 of the Code of 1923 provides that: “All suits at law or in equity, commenced by or for the use of a nonresident of this state, must be dismissed on motion, if security for the costs, approved by the clerk or register, be not given by such nonresident when the suit is commenced, or within such time thereafter as the court may direct.”

It has been- repeatedly held by this court that, if the defendant appeared and pleaded, or otherwise entered into the defense, without moving to dismiss for want of security for costs, this was a waiver of the objection and an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. CheneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  2. Davis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Ex parte BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Daggett v. BoomerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Capital City Water Co. v. State ex rel. MacdonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HaleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Brown v. EllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Gerace v. BentleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API