Legal Opinion

Brown v. Ellison

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 7, 1940No. 6 Div. 561PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

When a suit is brought by a nonresident without giving security for costs as required by Code, § 7249, the defendant may invoke the jurisdiction of the court by motion to dismiss for want of security for costs, whereupon, the court may fix a time within which security for costs shall be given. If given in compliance with such order, the statute is complied with. The notion that plaintiff must either give security at the time of filing suit, or get an order in advance giving time for so doing, is not the law under our present statute. Daggett v. Boomer, 210 Ala. 673, 99 So.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Ex parte BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Daggett v. BoomerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Pollak v. MilamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Henderson v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bobo v. Edwards Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Morris v. MouchetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API