Legal Opinion

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Haley

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1979No. Civ. 1658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs Haley were the insureds of a homeowner’s insurance policy issued by Auto-Owners Insurance Company. First Federal Savings and Loan Association was the Haleys’ mortgagee and the loss-payee under a standard New York mortgage clause contained in the policy.

The Haleys’ home was damaged as the result of blasting operations. They brought suit for $7,500 against Auto-Owners. They alleged in the complaint that they had requested First Federal to join them as plaintiffs in the suit and First Federal had refused to do so. Haleys alleged that First Federal was a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Girard Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Capital City Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Fire Insurance Companies v. FelrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. &198tna Ins. Co. v. KoonceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Harrison v. MockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Standard Fire Insurance v. KnowlesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
  3. First National Bank of Hamilton v. EstesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API