Legal Opinion

City of Milwaukee v. Krupnik

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

The appellant contends that the search of his premises was unlawful because made without a search warrant. Under the Severson law, then in force, peace officers, which included policemen, were authorized to search licensed premises without search warrants. Sec.’ 165.33, Stats. Therefore the police were authorized to make the search. While making the search the appellant destroyed certain fluids to prevent their inspection • and seizure. The Severson law made such action a criminal offense (sec. 165.21, Stats.). The ordinance of the city incorporated the provisions of the Severson law therein…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. City of Napa v. EasterbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Southern Operating Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Friedman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. City of Alamogordo v. McGeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. LookabillNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Ryan v. PietrzykowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API