Southern Operating Co. v. City of Chattanooga
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from Chancery Court, Hamilton County. — T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Chiee Justice Neil
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The bill in this case was filed to enjoin the collection of a privilege tax which it is alleged the city was about to collect from complainant as a liquor dealer.
Three grounds of relief are stated: Firstly, that complainant, although engaged in the sale of liquor and having its place of business within the city of Chattanooga, makes all of its purchases outside of the State of Tennessee, and likewise sells only to persons beyond the borders of the State, has so conducted its business from the start, and will continue this method of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baumgartner v. HastyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Kreulhaus v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- City of Napa v. EasterbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Richards v. Town of MagnoliaMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Dismukes v. Town of LouisvilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morgan v. LayneTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- L. A. Thompson Scenic Railway Co. v. McCabeMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. LookabillNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Milwaukee v. KrupnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.