Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 20, 2004No. 03-1863UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Linda Haynes, Jonathan Haynes, Regina Hayes, Jimmy Hayes and Lynda P. Jordan brought an action against Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (MetLife) claiming its agents made fraudulent representations which induced their purchases of life insurance. Appellants originally brought this action in the Circuit Court of Calhoun County, Alabama, on October 10, 2000, and MetLife removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on December 1, 2000. In March 2001, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation transferred this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moore v. TartlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Roger Turbe v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands Water and Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marshall v. FenstermacherDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Haskell v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. (In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. 101 WEST LEHIGH, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- HAMMOND v. ACERNODistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- SLF Holdings, LLC v. Uniti Fiber Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020