Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Fenstermacher
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 23, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-3477PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
PRATTER, District Judge.
Defendants Ronald Fenstermacher and High Swartz Roberts and Seidel move to dismiss the claims against them in this action alleging various claims related to allegedly fraudulent conduct. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The complaint in this case arises from several alleged schemes to prevent the Plaintiff, Ellen Marshall, from collecting a debt owed to her by Warren Matthei. 1 Ms. Marshall is an attorney who represented Mr. Matthei in 1992 with respect to his…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- In re GrassoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Kilbride Invs. Ltd. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Pa., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Semler v. HellersteinColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Moore v. PHH Mortgage Corp. (In Re Moore)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.