Legal Opinion

Sandford's Administrator v. Sandford

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 7, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

— Affirming in part and reversing in part.

Charles H. Sandford died testate and a resident of Shelby county. Before his death he executed his holographic will, and later he executed in the same way a codicil thereto. This equity action was brought by his administrator with the will annexed, and also as trustee under his will, against his devisees and heirs to obtain a judicial construction of the will and codicil and directions as to how plaintiff should proceed in the administration of the estate. The involved documents are much confused in their language…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davidson's ex'rs v. KemperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  2. Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Columbia Trust Co. v. ChristopherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Dudley v. WeinhartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  5. Webster v. WathenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ford v. YostCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. Caudle v. SmitherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  3. State v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Harned v. Dorman, Banking CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Luckett v. First National Lincoln Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API