Legal Opinion

Ford v. Yost

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 17, 1944PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner—

Reversing.

This suit seeks to have declared void Item 3 of the will of John W. Ford, Sr., as being in violation of the statute and rule against perpetuities and ¡asks for an accounting. The testator died March 24, 1924, and his son, John Ford, Jr., died intestate March 4, 1936. The suit was filed by Ann Ford, the widow of John Ford, Jr., in her own right and as guardian of their five children, and by Howard Ford, an adult child of a former marriage, against the trustee under the will, two children and a grandchild, the daughter of a deceased child…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Johnson v. PrestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Friday's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Chenoweth v. BullittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Hubbard v. BeverlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fiduciary Trust Co. v. MishouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Hull v. RolfsrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Fintak v. FintakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington v. PurcellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  5. Taylor v. DooleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API