Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 23, 1988No. 86-CV-1142PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Chief Judge.
In an order dated May 4, 1988, as corrected by an order dated May 10, 1988, the court denied defendants’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In that order, the court focused on the financial condition of defendant Charles W. Sears (“Sears”), and did not consider whether the financial condition of Sears’ wholly-owned corporation, Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc. (“The Company”), was such that it could proceed in forma pauperis in this action independent of Sears himself. The Company, represented by Geoffrey A. Hampton, Esq., for the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Allen Hodge v. Police Officers: Colon, 623 and Repuerto, 145Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie BandaccariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., Dba Sears Real Estate and Charles W. Sears, Appeal of Charles W. SearsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Krangel v. CrownDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1992
- In Re StephensonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.