Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 18, 1934No. 4 Div. 742PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill by the wife sought absolute divorce. Temporary alimony for the wife and child and reasonable attorney’s fees were likewise sought and allowed pursuant to the report of the register after due reference to that end and oral testimony taken.

The answer of the circuit judge in response to the rule nisi is not controverted by the evidence, and the truth or sufficiency thereof put in issue, and will be taken as true. Ex parte Apperson, 217 Ala. 176, 115 So. 226. The facts are before us and are so considered.

Pending suit for divorce, the court must make allowance for the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jeter v. JeterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  2. Bidwell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Ortman v. OrtmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Ex Parte AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Lee v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Ex Parte CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. BrittainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API