Legal Opinion

Egan v. McCray

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1934No. Docket No. L.A. 14329PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

A rehearing was granted herein because we entertained a doubt concerning whether the order hereinafter mentioned dismissing the action was in fact void. For reasons hereinafter stated we have concluded that it is unnecessary to determine that question.

This action, instituted August 2, 1929, was at issue and on for trial on April 29, 1930. It involves a money demand for $1346.08. At the time the case was called for trial the court, acting under the mistaken belief that it had been bereft of jurisdiction thereof by the provisions of the statute of 1929 (Stats. 1929, chap. 477, p. 837, in effect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Construction Co. v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. McCallum v. StullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Integral Land Corp. v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Bryant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Costa v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Gwinn v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API