Legal Opinion

McCallum v. Stull

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1922No. Civ. No. 4197PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to foreclose a judgment lien. Judgment went for the plaintiff and the defendant G. L. Stull has appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. The record presents but one question, and that is the question of procedure. Before proceeding further it is necessary to state the facts concerning the history of this litigation.

Prior to the ninth day of July, 1915, G. L. Stull, the appellant, commenced an action against P. McCallum et al., to quiet title. Thereafter the defendant in that action appeared and answered and at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harper v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Simmons v. ThreshourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Brown v. SchroederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Egan v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Rodgers v. HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API