Legal Opinion
Paul Uminski v. Clark County Sheriff's Office
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 20, 2025No. 3:25-cv-05853Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 PAUL UMINKSI, CASE NO. 3:25-cv-05853-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST 12 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. NO. 10) 13 CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 17 I BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”), submitted his 19 complaint against his former employer, Clark County Sheriff’s Office (“CCSO”). (Dkt. No. 6.) 20 He asserted causes of action for: (1) violation of Title VII…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Wilhelm v. RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Jesse J. Calhoun v. Donald N. Stahl James BrazeltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.