Legal Opinion
Moll v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 5, 1984No. C9-83-1629PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Lawrence Donald Moll was convicted on two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree. He appeals from an order denying his petition for post conviction relief. Appellant claims the trial court committed reversible error by including the unconstitutional statutory language of Minn.Stat. § 609.341, subd. 11 (1980), in the jury instructions. Appellant claims further that the trial court committed reversible error by excluding appellant and appellant’s attorney from a preliminary chambers examination where the competency of two child witnesses was determined.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- People v. ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Stincer v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.