Housing Rights Center v. Donald Sterling Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
MATZ, District Judge.
This is a housing discrimination case. Plaintiffs claim that Defendants have engaged in various discriminatory practices in violation of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., and California law. Plaintiffs now move for a preliminary injunction.
For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:(1) The Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion to enjoin Defendants from conducting investigations or inspections while…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fair Housing of Marin, a California Non-Profit Corporation v. Jack Combs, D.B.A. Waters Edge ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Freedom Newspapers of Texas v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Wentworth v. HedsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Housing Rights Center v. SterlingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Southern California Housing Rights Center v. KrugDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Alcaraz v. KMF Oakland LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.