Legal Opinion
Housing Rights Center v. Sterling
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 2, 2004No. CV 03-859DSF(EX)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FISCHER, District Judge.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case arises out of allegations that Defendants racially discriminated against their tenants in violation of federal law. The Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment against Plaintiff Jeffrey High (“Motion”), Separate Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law (“SUF”), Declarations of Joanne Lichtman, Harley Choi and Brian J. Kramer and Request for Judicial Notice were filed April 23, 2004. The Opposition, Statement of Genuine Issues…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cabrera v. AlvarezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Pack v. FORT WASHINGTON IIDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Southern California Housing Rights Center v. KrugDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Diamond House of SE Idaho, LLC v. City of AmmonDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019
- Alcaraz v. KMF Oakland LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.