Legal Opinion
Alcaraz v. KMF Oakland LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 11, 2019No. 3:18-cv-02801-SIUnknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BERNARDO ALCARAZ, Case No. 18-cv-02801-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 9 v. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 10 KMF OAKLAND LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 28 11 Defendants. 12 13 On September 13, 2019, plaintiff Bernardo Alcaraz, who is representing himself pro se, filed 14 an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and order to show cause. Dkt. 15 No. 28 (“TRO App.”). At a case management conference held that same day, the Court ordered 16 plaintiff to serve and notify the opposing side and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Johnson v. CouturierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- John Gamble Fie A. Gamble Life Care Residences, Inc., Doing Business as Oak Hill Residential Care v. City of EscondidoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.