Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Mancini v. Rundle

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 1963No. Misc. 2516PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREEDMAN, District Judge.

The petition for habeas corpus in this case presents the question whether Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), which overruled Wolf v. Colorado 1 and held that evidence obtained by a search and seizure in violation of the Federal Constitution is inadmissible in a State criminal trial, applies to a State prisoner whose trial was held before the decision was announced.

Before I reach this important question of law a question of fact must first be determined — whether the search and seizure here made was illegal.

I

The magistrate issued a search…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ensor v. CummingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. United States Ex Rel. Pierce v. PintoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
  3. United States Ex Rel. Epton v. NennaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  4. State v. RichterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. United States ex rel. Mancini v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API