Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Epton v. Nenna
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 15, 1968No. 68 Civ. 461PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FRANKEL, District Judge.
The petition for habeas corpus raises •complex and difficult questions of due process in both the procedural and the substantive meanings of the constitutional phrase. To mention only the problem which has caused particular concern at the outset of this proceeding, there is a sweeping attack upon the composition of the grand jury which indicted petitioner, implicating both the adequacy of the governing state statutes on their face .and the application of the statutes in the circumstances of this case. There are, in addition, questions under the First…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnston v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Stevens v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Epton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chestnut v. People of State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States Ex Rel. Mancini v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Francis T. Glynn v. Robert Donnelly, John M. Farrell v. Robert DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Lyle S. Woodcock v. Robert H. Donnelly, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at WalpoleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- People v. ChestnutNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Weiss v. WalshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Samuels v. MacKellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.