Legal Opinion
Distin v. Bolding
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 17, 1962No. 17943PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moss, Justice.
This action is one under the “Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act”, Section 10-2001 et seq., 1952 Code of Laws. The purpose of the action is to determine the constitutionality of certain provisions of Act No. 1114, of the Acts of 1960, 51 Stats. 2803, as subsequently amended by an Act of the General Assembly, approved March 30, 1962. By this Act the General Assembly created Jackson-Gills Creek Public Service District in Richland County, hereinafter referred to as the District. In so doing, it constituted a large area of Richland County into a special purpose district whose func…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hancock v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Chesebro v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- J.K. Construction, Inc. v. Western Carolina Regional Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Newton v. HanlonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- Hagley Homeowners Ass'n v. Hagley Water, Sewer, & Fire AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Celanese Corp. v. StrangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- Painter v. WestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973