Legal Opinion
Celanese Corp. v. Strange
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 14, 1979No. 20885PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice:
Respondents Celanese Corporation and Homelite, a division of Textron, Inc. brought separate actions challenging the constitutionality of Act No. 1414 of the 1970 Acts of the General Assembly. The lower court found that Act No. 1414 of 1970 violates Article 1 Section 3, Article III Section 34, and Article X Section 1 and Section 51 of the Constitution of this State. We hold that Act No. 1414 of 1970 violates Article X Section 1 and Section 5 and affirm.
The appellant Taylors Fire and Sewer District [District] is a special purpose district located in Greenville County. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Evans v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Jackson v. BreelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Distin v. BoldingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- Casey v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Senior Corp. v. Board of Assessment AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985