Legal Opinion

In Re Baxter

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided November 18, 1983No. Bankruptcy 1-79-01863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RALPH H. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge.

This court has previously held that the anti-assignment statute in the Social Security Act does not make a social security recipient ineligible for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and does not prevent the bankruptcy court from ordering the Social Security Administration (SSA) to send part of a recipient’s benefits to the Chapter 13 trustee. In re Hughes, 7 B.R. 791, 7 B.C.D. 12 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Tenn.1980).

All the courts that have considered the question have agreed that the anti-assignment statute was “implicitly repealed” to the extent…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hagan v. Heckler (In Re Hagan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
  2. Santiago-Monteverde v. Pereira (In re Santiago-Monteverde)District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Combustion Federal Credit Union v. Barron (In Re Barron)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1988
  4. Matter of RoachUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
  5. Neary v. McKittrick (In Re McKittrick)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API