Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. Reclamation Dist. No. 404

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1916No. Sac. No. 2267PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The complaint in this case states a cause of action to annul an assessment levied by the reclamation district to pay the cost of certain reclamation work of the district. The ground of the action was that for various reasons, not necessary here to mention, the assessment was invalid. Issues were formed, there was a trial by the court, and find ings of fact were made showing that the assessment was valid. As conclusions of law the court held that the assessment should not be annulled, but should be approved; that the same was a lien on the land against which it was assessed, but that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. City of San Diego v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Manning v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ex parte CheneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barber v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Southern Pacific R.R. Co. v. StibbensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. In re Imperial Irr. DistDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  5. Flinn v. ZerbeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API