Legal Opinion

Conwell v. Buchanan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1845PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— Assumpsit by Buchanan against Conwell for goods sold and delivered. Pleas, non assumpsit, and the statute of limitations. Issue, trial by the Court by consent of parties, and judgment for the plaintiff.

The account, on which the suit was commenced, was made in May and June, 1837; the suit was commenced on the 7th day of April, 1843. The deposition of a single witness was all the testimony offered on the trial. That witness testified that he then was, and had been ever since the 1st day of May, 1837, the clerk and book-keeper of the plaintiff; that the bill of goods attached to his deposition…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldsby v. GentleIndiana Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Penley v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  2. Barrett v. SippIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. McCallam v. PleasantsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Ferguson v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. MacMillan v. ClementsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API