Jeno's Inc. v. Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILES W. LORD, District Judge.
Before the Court are parties’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment. After careful consideration of the entire file, all proceedings and counsel’s memoranda, the Court is prepared to rule.
I. FACTS
Counsel have stipulated that for the purpose of disposing of the instant matter, the following constitutes the relevant and undisputed set of facts:
1. In January, 1970, plaintiff filed a first trademark application in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office seeking to register PIZZA ROLLS as a trademark for frozen pasta snacks.
2. In due course,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte Republic of PeruSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Claude Cartier v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Simmonds Aerocessories, Limited, Appelant v. Elastic Stop Nut Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Green v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Vizenor v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Informix Software, Inc. v. Oracle Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Lawrence v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.