Legal Opinion
Green v. Heckler
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 24, 1984No. 84-2211PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge:
I
Plaintiffs filed separate suits in the United States District Court after unsuccessful attempts to receive emergency advance payments from the Supplemental Security Income program. The district court consol*238idated their cases and then dismissed their suits for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We affirm the judgment of the district court and dismiss this appeal.
II
Plaintiffs Green and Totten were recipients of Supplemental Security Income benefits until the Department of Health and Human Services terminated their payments.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Public Affairs Associates, Inc. v. RickoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- RANDALL D. WOLCOTT, MD, PA v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Newsome v. EEOCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Ulric Paul Giddings v. Ronald C. Chandler, District Director InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- In Re First Federal Savings And Loan Association Of DurhamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.