Legal Opinion

City of Monmouth v. Lawson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1951No. 31778PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily

Appellees, Clyde Lawson, Ernest Rollins and Carl Graham, the first a property owner and the latter two construction men, were found guilty and fined, in a trial before a police magistrate, for violating an ordinance of the city of Monmouth which made it unlawful for anyone to build a drive-in gasoline filling station within that city without a permit. They appealed to the circuit court of Warren County, which court dismissed the cause on their motion, held the judgment of the police magistrate to be null and void, and assessed costs against the city. Following the entry of the judgment, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Bloomington v. WirrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ryan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Grutzius v. Armour & Co. of Delaware, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. City of Chicago v. OpenheimIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Hackner v. Van WyckIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. County of Cook v. RichertIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  3. City of Monmouth v. LawsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  4. Biggs v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Cisek v. Village of South HollandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API