Commonwealth v. Clemens
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY OLSON, J.:
Appellant, Brandon Clemens, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on November 23, 2011. We affirm.
On appeal, Appellant claims that the lower court erred when it denied his pre-trial motion to suppress. In reviewing such a challenge, this Court “must consider only the evidence of the prosecution and so much of the evidence of the defense as remains uncontradicted when read in the context of the record as a whole.” Commonwealth v. Eichinger, 591 Pa. 1, 915 A.2d 1122, 1134 (2007) (internal citations omitted). Observed in this light, the relevant facts are as follows.
O…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. EichingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. LuczkiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. JaynesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.