Legal Opinion

State v. Hamdan

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 2013No. 2013-KA-0113PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.

1,A jury found Mazen Hamdan guilty of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, a violation of La. R.S. 14:95.1. He appeals his conviction.1 He argues that the evidence supporting the prosecution’s assertion that he possessed a firearm is insufficient to sustain its burden on that essential element of the offense. He also argues that his right to confront and cross-examine one of his accusers, a police officer who had testified at the preliminary hearing but who was not called as a prosecution witness at the trial itself, was violated. And he finally argues that his…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ButlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. State v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. State v. CastroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. State v. ClementsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. State v. GilliamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API