Legal Opinion

Hodge v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 31, 1988No. 88-105PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The question in this case is one of computing time. The trial judge held that after the appellant took a voluntary nonsuit, he did not refile his complaint within the time required by law. We find a uniform rule which we apply to such situations dictates that the suit was timely.

The facts are undisputed. The appellant sued Wal-Mart and its local store manager Benny Cash on a slip and fall case in 1983. On May 8,1986, the appellant took a voluntary nonsuit. On May 8,1987, he refiled the suit against Wal-Mart but substituted Kirk Ward as a defendant in place of Benny…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peay v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. State Ex Rel. Hebert v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Matthews v. WarfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Chavis v. PridgeonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  5. Shanks v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grubbs v. Credit General InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Phelan v. Discover BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Union National Bank v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Kersh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Banning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API