Legal Opinion

Shanks v. Clark

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

Appellant’s first assignment, that the court erred in holding her cause of action on the note barred under the 5-year statute of limitations, is well taken. The statute, § 6955, C. & M. Digest, provides: “Action on promissory notes, and other instruments in writing, not under seal, shall be commenced within 5 years after the cause of action shall accrue, and not-afterwards.” It has long been the settled rule that the maker has the whole of the day upon which the note becomes due in which to pay it, and that he cannot be sued until the next day, the day upon which the cause of action accrues.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peay v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Lawrence County Bank v. ArndtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  3. Moore v. HorsleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  4. Zachery v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  5. Holland v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woodard v. HollidaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Phelan v. Discover BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Union National Bank v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Hodge v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Randle v. Overland Texarkana CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API