Jenkins v. Fields
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPabkeR, J.
A completed compromise and settlement fairly made between persons legally competent to contract and having the authority to do so with respect to the subject matter of the compromise, and supported by sufficient consideration, operates as a merger of, and bars all right to recover on, the claim or right of action included therein, as would a judgment duly entered in an action between said persons. Snyder v. Oil Co., 235 N.C. 119, 68 S.E. 2d 805; Hinson v. Davis, 220 N.C. 380, 17 S.E. 2d 348; Armstrong v. Polakavetz, 191 N.C. 731, 133 S.E. 16; Sutton v. Robeson, 31 N.C. 380; 11 Am. Jur.,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Snyder v. Kenan Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Davis v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sauers v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- McGill v. Bison Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Bradford v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Financial Services of Raleigh, Inc. v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Houghton v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.