Legal Opinion

Chun v. City and County of Honolulu

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 13, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00131Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII CURTIS CHUN, Civ. No. 18-00131 JMS-RT Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 71 CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 71 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Curtis Chun (“Chun” or “Plaintiff”) initiated this employment discrimination action stemming from his termination by Defendant City and County of Honolulu. (“the City”). Before the court is the City’s Motion for Summary Judgment seeking dismissal based on the filing of the complaint…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API