General Committee of Adjustment of Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers for Pacific Lines of Southern Pac. Co. v. Southern Pac. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, hereinafter called Engineers’ Committee, brought suit for a judgment declaring invalid certain provisions in a contract, hereinafter called the Firemen’s Schedule, between the defendant below, hereinafter called the Railway, one of the appellees, and the intervenor below, also one of the appellees, hereinafter called the Firemen’s Committee. The district court’s judgment gave an interpretation of the contract and a declaration of the rights of the contracting parties and their effect upon the intervenor which both the parties to the contract, the Firemen’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Estes v. Union Terminal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- John P. McElroy v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, a Corporation, and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Stanley Pyzynski v. New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Taylor v. Missouri Pacific RR Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985
- Coar v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985