Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Missouri Pacific RR Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 20, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-700PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
DUPLANTIER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Taylor, Brockhoeft, Ruiz and Sepeich are railway workers employed by defendant Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (“MOPAC”). Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (“BLE”), of which the individual plaintiffs are members, is the collective bargaining representative pursuant to the Railway Labor Act (“RLA” or “Act”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-163 (1972), for the craft of locomotive engineers employed by MOPAC. Defendant United Transportation Union (“UTU”) is the collective bargaining representative for the crafts of switchmen and firemen…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Felter v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. RychlikSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paul G. Landers v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- W.G. Taylor v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Coar v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1992