Legal Opinion
Munoz Arill v. Maiz
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided January 7, 1998No. 96-1725 (JP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PIERAS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The Court has before it defendants’ Motion Requesting Dismissal (docket No. 14) and plaintiffs’ Opposition thereto (docket No. 18). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED.
Plaintiffs Roberto Muñoz Arill, Laura Rebeca Ayoroa Santaliz, and José Norat Ramirez (collectively, “the plaintiffs”), own and reside on real estate located on Road 8176 in Cupey Alto, San Juan, Puerto Rico. They bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the defendants have violated and conspired to violate…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golf Village N., LLC v. City of Powell, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Wehran-Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Municipality of AreciboDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. RoundsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2006
- Outdoor Media Display Posters, Inc. v. Negron RocheDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004