Legal Opinion

Funk v. Bannon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 11, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBordon, J.

In this action, the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by a dog owed and kept by the defendants. The trial court rendered judgment against the defendant Andrew F. Gorske and in favor of the other two defendants. The defendant Andrew F. Gorske, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, has appealed.

The finding, which is not subject to correction, discloses the following facts: The defendant and his wife owned and occupied property in New Haven at 96 Myron Street. On June 27, 1958, the defendant owned, and had owned for several years, a German…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Granniss v. WeberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Kelley v. KilloureySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Briggs v. BeckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Stults v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Squires v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Malchanoff v. TruehartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Collins v. WetherbeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Doerfler v. ReddingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API