Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. v. Lloyd
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Moore.
We will refer to plaintiff in error as defendant or the railroad, and to defendant in error by name or as plaintiff.
Two claims were set forth in the complaint' of plaintiff. The first arises under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. Section 51). No issues are presented in this court as to the second claim and we make no further reference to it.
Under the first claim plaintiff alleged that on, May 1, 1955, while in the course of his employment as a locomotive engineer for defendant, he was injured as a proximate result of defendant’s negligence in that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gibson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Deen v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Blood Services v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Chabot v. WILLIAMS CHEVROLET COMPANYColorado Court of Appeals · 1971