Legal Opinion

Deen v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 8, 1957No. 199PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

We hold that the proofs justified with reason the jury’s conclusion that employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury. Rogers v. Missouri *926Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500; Webb v. Illinois Central R. Co., 352 U. S. 512; Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 352 U. S. 521. The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded. Mr. Justice Frankfurter would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. See his dissent in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent for the reasons given in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Webb v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company v. DeenTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Arnold v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Gibson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API