Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1988No. B029452Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, J.

Petitioner successfully moved to have a default judgment against him set aside. Real parties appealed that ruling. Petitioner moved the respondent court to have returned to him certain property which was the subject of the judgment. The respondent court denied the motion, stating that it had no jurisdiction over the matter because real parties had filed a notice of appeal. In our opinion filed September 25, 1987, we held that the court had jurisdiction to entertain the motion, and suggested that it would be appropriate for the court to set bond in this case.

The Supreme Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bulmash v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In re Estate of CrozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Miller v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API