Legal Opinion

Weaver Construction Co. v. Heitland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 16, 1984No. 83-803PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLE, Justice.

Defendant’s appeal raises two questions requiring us to interpret the Iowa statute governing offers to confess judgment. Defendant availed itself of one of the four methods which Iowa Code chapter 677 (1983) provides for shifting “costs” of an action to a plaintiff who rejects a defendant’s formal offer to confess judgment. See generally Sheer Construction, Inc. v. W. Hodgman and Sons, Inc., 326 N.W.2d 328, 333 (Iowa 1982) (describing elements of the four methods of offering to confess judgment under chapter 677). When the plaintiff obtained a judgment in a lesser amount than…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sheer Construction, Inc. v. W. Hodgman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Thorn v. KelleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  3. Tilton v. Iowa Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Scriven v. ScrivenNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Harrison v. Iowa Midland R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coker v. Abell-Howe Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. Hearity v. Iowa District Court for Fayette CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Shirley v. PothastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. Harris v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API