Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Basking

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 2009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ALLEN, J.:

¶ 1 In this case, we are asked to explore the contours of the common authority and apparent authority doctrines, which are corollaries to the consent exception to the warrant requirement.1 Additionally, this Court must decide if the apparent authority exception, if adopted and applied to the citizens of this Commonwealth, violates the strong notion of privacy inherent in Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

¶ 2 The Commonwealth appeals from the trial court’s order granting Andre Basking’s (“Basking”) motion to suppress, finding that the police search of…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. PORTER P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. AntoszykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Com. v. Lehnerd, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Com. v. Baez, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API