Legal Opinion

Fothergill v. Kaija

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1935No. 25371. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb, J.-

Respondent instituted this action as executrix on behalf of herself and her four minor children to recover damages growing out of the death of Harold R. Fothergill at about noon on October 19, 1933, as the result of an automobile collision. Respondent is the widow of decedent. In her complaint, she asked for fifty thousand dollars damages on account of the death of her husband; in a second cause of action, claimed $381.99 special damages incident to his injuries and death; and a third cause of action claimed $130 as damages to the automobile driven by decedent.

The case was tried…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Comfort v. PennerWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Martin v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Mathias v. EichelbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hamilton v. CadwellWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bowen v. BaumgardnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API